[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 17:31:24 +0900 |
Florian Weimer <address@hidden> writes:
> Is there some fix to make the branches "micro" again? If development
> continues for some time, they wil accumulate patches from the upstream
> branch, which means that branches aren't really *that* cheap.
The `obvious' way would be to re-tag from the upstream branch instead of
merging from it, but I've always been afraid to do this, as you always
hear about problems with mixed commit/tag branches.
Anyone try?
-Miles
--
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
- [Gnu-arch-users] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Florian Weimer, 2004/05/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Julian T. J. Midgley, 2004/05/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Tom Lord, 2004/05/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Miles Bader, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Andrew Suffield, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Bug Goo, 2004/05/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/29