[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes
From: |
Robert Widhopf-Fenk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 16:58:30 +0200 |
On Monday, May 24, 2004 at 13:35:19, James Blackwell wrote:
> James Blackwell wrote:
> >> Yeah, I say we take a step back, and instead of covering the
> >> trivial mistakes up, we go back to square one and teach them the
> >> purpose of "what-changed"
>
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> > Well go ahead and teach them, probably you have time or the
> > maybe the question will not rise anymore. But, whenever one
> > asks that dumb question again, we will refer to you as as
> > teacher :c)
>
> When I said "we" I was referring to the community of arch
> developers. To whom do you refer when you say "we?"
WE, the arch newbies wondering about empty commits and their
use and asking the dump question in the first place. ;c)
Let's close this thread here and focus on the feature plan ...
Regards
Robert
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Johannes Berg, 2004/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Miles Bader, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Matthieu Moy, 2004/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Julian T. J. Midgley, 2004/05/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Miles Bader, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, James Blackwell, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, Miles Bader, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes, James Blackwell, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes,
Robert Widhopf-Fenk <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Jani Monoses, 2004/05/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, James Blackwell, 2004/05/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, Aaron Bentley, 2004/05/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "tla commit" generates a patch-set even if there are no changes, James Blackwell, 2004/05/14