[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:50:16 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Matthew Palmer <address@hidden>
> That last little bit there is the real problem, in my humble and
incomplete
> understanding of the situation. tla really is "Tom Lord's Arch"
> --
Without commenting on any of the rest let me just clear that up and
admit the truth about the Three Letter Acronym:
Where I come form, tla is elementary-school-speak for "True Love
Always".
Corny but true.
Of course, that "tla" is plausibly any of about a half-dozen other
acronyms is also part of the reason it was chosen as the name.
The real question (at least lately) is: is the "true" more, or is it
less the same as the "beautiful"?
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] No release forthcoming, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] No release forthcoming, James Blackwell, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] No release forthcoming, James Blackwell, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] No release forthcoming, Tom Lord, 2004/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, Robin Green, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, James Blackwell, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, Robin Green, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, James Blackwell, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, Matthew Palmer, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, Robin Green, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again, Robin Green, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch funding models, again,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] No release forthcoming, James Blackwell, 2004/09/24
Message not available