[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
Mark Stosberg |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 02:59:26 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) |
On 2004-11-15, Karel Gardas <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Darcs' cons:
>
> - darcs does not support patch signing (showstopper for me)
> - darcs does not support permission handling (even bigger showstopper)
Other darcs users have expressed in the permissions feature. (I'd like
it myself!). It was being discussed on the users list quite recently.
Also, added some 'pre' and 'post' hooks to commands was discussed
recently as well. These allow the potential for an external script
to fix permissions issues until some built-in solution appears.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Alexey N. Solofnenko, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Alexey N. Solofnenko, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
Mark Stosberg <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17