[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] tla Vs baz (was Re: tla changes vs. baz status)
From: |
Matthieu Moy |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] tla Vs baz (was Re: tla changes vs. baz status) |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:53:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> I haven't checked since baz 1.3. I sent zillions of nitpicky bug
> reports about that version
I suppose you're talking of things like
http://lists.seyza.com/pipermail/gnu-arch-dev/2005-February/000669.html
> I expect it's more likely they were just ignored).
I went quickly through it. Many of the issues you've reported have
been fixed since then (resolved, message without "*" prefix, update
being too verbose for example) ...
> Basically I think it was that the "M filname" style output was
> gratuitously indented or something (which mucks up any script that
> uses a regexp like '^[ADM] ...').
... but not this one. Actually, status puts different things in the
first and second columns. I'm not 100% clear about the rationale for
the distinction.
If you get time, you may give baz another try. Your feedback and
perhaps your help can be very valuable.
--
Matthieu
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla changes vs. baz status, Stefan Reichör, 2005/06/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla changes vs. baz status, Harald Meland, 2005/06/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla changes vs. baz status, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/06/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Thomas Lord, 2005/06/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla Vs baz (was Re: tla changes vs. baz status),
Matthieu Moy <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status), Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status), Miles Bader, 2005/06/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status), Miles Bader, 2005/06/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status), Miles Bader, 2005/06/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status), Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/16
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/20
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/21