[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ..
From: |
jblack |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:21:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:45:46PM +0200, Matthieu MOY wrote:
> martin f krafft said:
>
> > Another thing I am completely missing from baz is better/more
> > flexibly/scalable hook support.
>
> That's very hard to do in a secure way: baz hooks are arbitrary code, and
> have to be ran on the client since there's no real server. And I don't
> want arbitrary code to be executed on my machine when I run baz ...
Not to pick nits, but hooks aren't arbitrary code. They're code that
traditionally the user himself has written.
> pqm is a solution. arch-trigger is another one.
>
> I don't know how bzr can handle this. If there's support for sandboxing in
> Python, the plugin system of bzr can probably implement this in an elegant
> and secure way.
Shouldn't be a problem. Think of pqm as an authenticated email based
shell. You could do just about anything with it, much of which has nothing
f to do with revision control at all. :)
> I prefer bzr to take its time and provide something really good than hurry
> and release a half finished stable version soon ;-).
Patience is a virtue. :)
--
James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed
Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Jan Hudec, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu MOY, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?,
jblack <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, jblack, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Anand Kumria, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, jblack, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23