Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch: automatic cacherev and smarter get

[Matthew Hannigan]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 06:57:06PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Besides, a revlib consumes a _huge_ amount of inodes that constitutes a
> > real problem in many cases (compared to one tarball per 50 revisions).
> 
> git already proved this is not a real problem.

It's has been something that has troubled the kernel.org people.

Perhaps a different implementation of revlibs might help.

Matt