Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?

[Andy Tai]

James I don't think this is an issue here.  Arch was of Tom's
design and Arch 2.0 is still Tom's design.  So it is great that
Tom is leading the discussion and if Tom wants to push Arch 2.0 forward
I am all for it. 

I have kept tla alive, but for major advancements Tom is the best
person to push for them and to lead the community to achieve
them.  (Yes, I still keep tla alive.  Tla is not going
anywhere but won't see any big changes either)

On 4/23/06, James Blackwell <address@hidden> wrote:

Andy has done a very good job running GnuArch. He communicates well, is
skilled at avoiding minefields on this list, is open to ideas from
everyone on the group and seeks consensus. I nominate Andy Tai to stay in
charge of GnuArch.