[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x
From: |
Julian Marchant |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:52:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I see. But why would a tiny distro for old hardware do all the work
> (probably doubling the number of packages in the best case) needed
> to add the entire toolchain for development and building and
> compiling and configuring and all the dependencies (such as the
> scripting languages used by git and other tools)?
You're talking about how long it takes to compile. The way I interpret
the exception for distros like LibreWRT and LibreCMC is that it's for
systems going on devices that *can't* do self-hosting because they
don't have enough storage space. That's a very different situation.
Because of space constraints, it makes sense that something like
LibreWRT might be entirely unable to include the tools necessary to
self-host. But with your system, you're saying it's not practical to
compile the system on the machines you're intending to run it on
because of speed.
I'm not entirely sure, but I suppose the self-hosting requirement is
there to be future-proof:
- - If all but one libre distro stop being developed, and that one
distro isn't self-hosting, that would leave us with an OS that can't
be built without an OS that's either not completely libre or outdated.
- - If all of the distros that could be used to compile a
non-self-hosting distro are discontinued, we would be left unable to
compile that non-self-hosting distro without an OS that's either not
completely libre or outdated.
I'm not sure I agree that it's a problem, but I think that's the
reasoning.
- --
Julian Marchant
https://onpon4.github.io
Protect your privacy with GnuPG:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVPSXoAAoJELP1a+89AVMCwRUH/2S3BDA16dqSF/QlsjXfNRxv
13cvLDGNH7WaTnfukMKjxPeB5QxqYliquErjJiW4ePTlq8ssbzUHoWj72dIMsaib
U7vsOIHkQAji2yjcn4BCcf1JxsB5wZXIJ9iQt+PhcJyrYN8H/R3zzzAqSQRbw2VI
pe1xXZwSPABScGMSUyz1W6x9tj6UPS0LE4twnGE3U7flh2MGhdaP8SpHoNP6Y4rr
X618reBQ940YAULEns5cP90ZU0nbo6kg8zcp2a6CY4O+X5V8tqo7c17z+CfsHVsc
jZWU7q4G+U8LrJc5QvVdO8bbTfHLZSmNPFbRGKds/qIU5Gc5oNwd/9XKuYS9vXE=
=X0oj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, (continued)
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Ineiev, 2015/04/14
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Dima Krasner, 2015/04/14
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, fr33domlover, 2015/04/25
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Jason Self, 2015/04/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, fr33domlover, 2015/04/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Nicolás Reynolds, 2015/04/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x,
Julian Marchant <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Riley Baird, 2015/04/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Jason Self, 2015/04/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Dima Krasner, 2015/04/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] RLSD GNU/Linux-libre 2.x, Ineiev, 2015/04/27