[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:55:58 +0100 |
John Hasler wrote:
>
> rjack writes:
> > It's an economic model that hopes to destroy capitalistic notions of
> > intellectual property.
>
> There is nothing capitalistic about "intellectual property".
This must be why Moglen's "dotCommunist Manifesto" is such an act of
idiocy -- by closely following the structure of the Communist Manifesto
it ties the free software/free culture movement to those "class
struggle" aspects of Marxism, not only anarcho-communist message of
elimination of exclusive private property -- major contribution to
"freedom", whereas freedom is not a concept Marx spent a lot of time
on in theory, nor did Lenin in practice.
Right, uncle Hasler?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04