[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
David Golden |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:20:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.4 |
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Or Treacherous Computing/Digital Restriction Managment, which is one
> of the nicest things the GPLv3 draft touches upon.
>
Hmph. I'm not sure - Maybe taking "copyright law" as too broad a brush,
but in its absence, anti-circumvention provisions would disappear? It's
not technological aspects of DRM or TC that worry me particularly,
it's the legal anti-circumvention provisions.
Vaguely similarly, binary-only software releases don't hold huge terror
for me, it's legal prohibition of reverse-engineering of binary-only
software I really don't like.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing,
David Golden <=
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04