[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:02:24 +0100 (CET) |
> Only with laws that explicitly ban non-free software would the
> GPL become unnecessary.
I would find such laws highly objectionable.
Laws like that are exactly what laws should be like, they should make
immoral and unethical behaviour punishable. All users should have the
four freedoms of software, nobody should be excluded, and only with
laws that explicitly prohibit the subjugation of user rights can this
be possible.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04