[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL traitor !

From: Joerg Schilling
Subject: Re: GPL traitor !
Date: 19 May 2009 22:35:13 GMT

In article <address@hidden>,
Hyman Rosen  <address@hidden> wrote:
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> In article <address@hidden>,
>> Hyman Rosen  <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Thus, copyright holders of GPLed components grant permission for their
>>> works to be copied as part of a collective work only if the work as a
>>> whole is distributed under the GPL. And this applies best when the
>> This is of course nonsense unless you have specific addition information from
>> such authors.
>You need no such information, because this is what the GPL text specifies.

No, it does not.

>> The GPL does not include a rule that would allow to make such a claim.
>Of course it does:
>     <>

This is not the GPL but GPLv3, which is a less free variant....

People who speak about "the GPL" mean GPLv2 unless otherwise mentioned.

EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
      address@hidden            (uni)  
      address@hidden (work) Blog:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]