[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM
From: |
Luca Ferroni |
Subject: |
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:59:57 +0200 |
Il Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:27:54 -0400, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> ha
scritto:
> Before continuing with my explanation I reiterate that in PackageFS,
> unlike in GNU, symbolic links contained in /packages are
> and "end point". They come _after_ system real hierarchy,
> do not change it in any way.
>
> Could PackageFS be adapted so that the contents of /package
> does control it?
Sorry, I don't understand.
But now I get some ideas about improving GNU PM translator
in PackageFS-way.
I'm starting a new thread.
--
Luca Ferroni
www.cs.unibo.it/~fferroni/
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27