[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Status |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:39:19 +0200 (CEST) |
I think that the GNU system must implement a new package system
that makes use of all these features (stowfs, etc..), that was the
reason why we start writting the STUT.
I must be missing something, stowfs and the GNU System Creator are
doing this already for quite some time, so this cannot be why you
started writting STUT (maybe I'm confusing you with someone else, but
I seem to recall that we discussed GSC/stowfs a while back).
How is STUT different from GSC/stowfs?
Why wasn't this discussed here before any new uncoordinated efforts
were started?
Is there a possibility of merging the projects together?
Cheers.
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/11
- Re: Status, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, Declan Naughton, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, pancake, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Status, Alfredo Beaumont, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, a thing, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, pancake, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/12
- Re: Status, pancake, 2006/06/13
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/13
- Re: Status, pancake, 2006/06/13
- Re: Status, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/13
- Re: Status, pancake, 2006/06/12