[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:32 -0400 |
You can just merge ams-branch to HEAD, will save you alot of work. It
still contains a slew of patches and bug fixes that have not been
commited.
These patches and fixes have to be considered one by one.
If they have been put together in one branch, that means
he has to disentangle them in order to consider them.
- Re: about GNU Hurd, (continued)
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/07
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Filip Brcic, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05