[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What to call Guix
From: |
davi |
Subject: |
Re: What to call Guix |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:45:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
amd64 |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I liked Guixotic because it avoids this problem. There are other
> ways to avoid it, perhaps not as clever and funny as Guixotic but
> they'd be acceptable.
For now, the more I like is also Guixotic.
- Re: What to call Guix, (continued)
- Re: What to call Guix, Kete Foy, 2015/01/15
- Re: What to call Guix, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/15
- Re: What to call Guix, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Nala Ginrut, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Kete Foy, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix,
davi <=
- Re: What to call Guix, 白い熊, 2015/01/17
- Re: What to call Guix, 白い熊, 2015/01/17
- Re: What to call Guix, Jude Rubini, 2015/01/17
- Re: What to call Guix, Olaf Buddenhagen, 2015/01/23
- Re: What to call Guix, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2015/01/17
- Re: What to call Guix, Olaf Buddenhagen, 2015/01/23
- Re: What to call Guix, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2015/01/16
- Re: What to call Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/01/19