[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] regarding paul_3_13.8a

From: bump
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] regarding paul_3_13.8a
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 08:24:16 -0800

> this might have been a hasty decision. this patch, in fact, does the
> very same that paul_3_13.8a did (though only with owl databases). i
> don't know why it doesn't fail global:4 and 5, this is perhaps the
> effect of some other patch. i'm going to investigate this (by
> checking why paul_3_13.8a did fail those test and whether it does so
> now).

Do you mean I should back the patch out?

If you want I'll back both paul_3_14.1 and paul_3_13.8b out of the cvs,
or (if you want) I'll back out just paul_3_14.1.

Nando pointed out that it is conceivable that the pattern Arend
pointed out with D305 could be due to a captured goal element.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]