[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues
From: |
Hubert Chathi |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:28:59 -0400 |
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:16:48 -0500 "Stefan Bidigaray"
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I think we aren't going to get anywhere this way! I mentioned it on a
> previous e-mail, the issue needs to be escalated to and clarified by
> the FSF. They designed the licenses and know more than anyone else
> what are the restrictions.
I'm not sure what needs to be clarified. The compatibility table in
the GPL FAQ, written by the FSF, says that you can't link a GPLv2'd
application against a LGPLv3'd library, which is exactly the case we
have. It seems that the FSF has already clarified the issue for us.
--
Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: address@hidden - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
- Re: Fwd: GPLv2 licensing issues, (continued)
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Alexander Malmberg, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Stefan Bidigaray, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Stefan Bidigaray, 2008/04/10
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues,
Hubert Chathi <=
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Stefan Bidigaray, 2008/04/11
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Fred Kiefer, 2008/04/11
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Hubert Chathi, 2008/04/13
- Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Yavor Doganov, 2008/04/15
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Alexander Malmberg, 2008/04/12
Re: GPLv2 licensing issues, Yavor Doganov, 2008/04/11