Re: [Gomp-discuss] OpenMP: Examples 1

[Diego Novillo]

On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 13:59, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:

> I think we should just stick to low-latency parallelism in GOMP; 
> otherwise, I think we're mixing what some people see as apples and oranges.
> 
Yes.  OpenMP on distributed memory hardware gets into all the headaches
associated with shared virtual memory.  You need a lot more support from
the compiler and run time system.


Diego.