[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Feb 2003 14:39:36 +0000 |
Hi James,
> > I guess another option is to use troff's .mso request instead of -ms
> > on the command line? Then LL, etc. can be defined before the .mso.
>
> Just having the .po request in the file is sufficient, and one has to
> do it anyway if one wants the page offset to take place immediately.
> That's probably why the bug has stayed under the radar for so long:
> ".nr PO xx" and ".po xx" are usually paired anyway.
Agreed, but I was thinking more of a general way to avoid setting
registers on the command line, which separates that information from the
document.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/05
- RE: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ted Harding, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/02/08
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, James J. Ramsey, 2003/02/08
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/02/27
- Re: [Groff] Apparent weirdness with -ms's PO and LL, Larry Kollar, 2003/02/27