[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jan 2007 00:30:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Deri James <address@hidden>:
> 3. The 'man' page author intends to present technical information in the way
> he thinks it will be easiest for the audience to absorb, i.e. he will be more
> interested in presentation and content than structure.
He'll be interested in content, yes. But I don't see how the rest of this
follows.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Larry Kollar, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] doclifter on groffer.man, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/01
- [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Gunnar Ritter, 2007/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Third-party viewers, KDE, and the "portable set", Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/02