[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch
From: |
NIIBE Yutaka |
Subject: |
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:39:06 +0900 (JST) |
Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> It actually looks like you're moving the thread switching code to a
> place where scm_ints_disabled can have a different value than now.
> I don't have time to verify this, but if that is true, it could cause
> strange things to happen to the current COOP threads...
Yes, I moved it. I dont' think it causes bad behavior, but I agree to
verify and double-check it.
> Please have a look at the thread "plug in" interface in Dirk's code.
Yes. I could get core dump. It means that it's reproducible.
However, when I did it from scratch, it works fine.
I mean: autogen.sh, configure,make and test, it works fine.
Well, I've checked more. I got core dump, make clean & make (new
guile), it works fine (no core dump).
Wasn't it just such a issue?
--
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, (continued)
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/02
Thread support plan with initial patch, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/02
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/03
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/04/03
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/04/05
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/06
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/04/06
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/07
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/04/06
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/04/06
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/06
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/04/06