[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm? |
Date: |
24 Apr 2001 09:53:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden> writes:
> Has (srfi srfi-8) been in Guile 1.4? If not, I'd say we should move
> it, if yes, we should copy or symlink it. But maybe it would be
> better to keep two copies (the module is not difficult to maintain),
> and make the version in ice-9 issue a `deprecated' warning.
As far as I can tell, it wasn't in guile 1.4, so it's probably safe to
move it as far as the public is concerned.
So I guess the only question is whether or not we really need to keep
a deprecated version. I'd prefer not to, but do we need to?
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/23
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/25
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/29
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/29