[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm? |
Date: |
24 Apr 2001 19:20:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
Rob> So I guess the only question is whether or not we really need
Rob> to keep a deprecated version. I'd prefer not to, but do we
Rob> need to?
I think we do need to. In fact, I think it's a benefit to do so, as
it creates a precedent that allows us to think more freely about
reorganizing all the other files in ice-9.
And the nice thing about our deprecation convention is that deprecated
things will disappear after a few releases.
Neil
- Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/23
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/25
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/29
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/29