[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elisp development news
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Elisp development news |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 06:02:24 -0800 |
From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Date: 12 Nov 2001 23:27:39 +0000
- Programmers writing new applications using Guile should be happy,
too. There is almost no extant Emacs Lisp code which doesn't use
buffers and other Emacs-specific data types; any Emacs Lisp code
they want to use in their application will need porting anyway.
Seriously, no issue here, although I'm not sure I understand the
thrust of the last point.
because the trickiness manifests in interface design (as you point out
earlier in the post), the fact that emacs is very tied to its data types
narrows the problem down to w/in shouting distance of some potentially
small portability library. this makes guile programmers happy.
thi
- Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/02
- Re: Elisp development news, Ken Raeburn, 2001/11/03
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/11
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/11
- Re: Elisp development news, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/11
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/12
- Re: Elisp development news, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/19
- Re: Elisp development news, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/21
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/21
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/23
- Re: Elisp development news,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/21
- Re: Elisp development news, Ken Raeburn, 2001/11/16
- Re: Elisp development news, Alex Schroeder, 2001/11/17
- Re: Elisp development news, Ken Raeburn, 2001/11/25
- Re: Elisp development news, Alex Schroeder, 2001/11/25