[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elisp development news
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Elisp development news |
Date: |
21 Nov 2001 20:06:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Thien-Thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
Thien-Thi> From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden> Date: 12
Thien-Thi> Nov 2001 23:27:39 +0000
Jim> - Programmers writing new applications using Guile
Jim> should be happy, too. There is almost no extant Emacs
Jim> Lisp code which doesn't use buffers and other
Jim> Emacs-specific data types; any Emacs Lisp code they
Jim> want to use in their application will need porting
Jim> anyway.
Neil> Seriously, no issue here, although I'm not sure I
Neil> understand the thrust of the last point.
Thien-Thi> because the trickiness manifests in interface design
Thien-Thi> (as you point out earlier in the post), the fact that
Thien-Thi> emacs is very tied to its data types narrows the
Thien-Thi> problem down to w/in shouting distance of some
Thien-Thi> potentially small portability library. this makes
Thien-Thi> guile programmers happy.
Sorry... Thanks for trying, but I'm afraid I still don't really get
it. Could you illustrate perhaps with a specific example?
Neil
- Re: Elisp development news, (continued)
- Re: Elisp development news, Ken Raeburn, 2001/11/03
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/11
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/11
- Re: Elisp development news, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/11
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/12
- Re: Elisp development news, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/19
- Re: Elisp development news, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/21
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/21
- Re: Elisp development news, Neil Jerram, 2001/11/23
- Re: Elisp development news, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/21
- Re: Elisp development news,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Elisp development news, Ken Raeburn, 2001/11/16
- Re: Elisp development news, Alex Schroeder, 2001/11/17
- Re: Elisp development news, Ken Raeburn, 2001/11/25
- Re: Elisp development news, Alex Schroeder, 2001/11/25