[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [g-wrap] Changes needed by the "glueless" approach
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: [g-wrap] Changes needed by the "glueless" approach |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:30:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > BTW. gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease) compiles things fast
> > for me now, no more 10 minutes waiting for an OOM kill. What are you
> > doing this for, anyway?
> >
> Well, my experience is with gcc 3.3.2 (Debian):
>
> cc1: out of memory allocating 182094100 bytes after a total of 19058688 bytes
Man, mine started doing that the other day too. 2.4. I think I was just
having strange things happen with ccache (I normally use CC='ccache
gcc').
> Of course this was done with -O2 on the ~140K line binding, -O0 works
> fine.
Hm, interesting. You say in another mail that you have (gnome gtk)
loading reasonably quickly. How long before we can see that in CVS? I'm
really looking forward to it, hope we don't get bogged down waiting for
g-wrap to move.
Regards,
wingo.
- Re: [g-wrap] Changes needed by the "glueless" approach,
Andy Wingo <=