[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?! |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:07:29 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> If one happens to have sane bold and italic fonts, probably not the
> worst idea.
Such things don't just happen. I actually made up my own italics version of
misc-fixed-semicondensed since it didn't exist. Nowadays, it comes
standard so I ditched my home-grown font.
>> Have you tried my new doctex-mode ? It's not using AUCTeX so it's
>> probably no good for you, but you might like the idea.
> The thing in CVS? That merely fiddles with fontlock, right?
Right. Tho not the faces part of font-lock, but the syntactic part (the
face part then automatically follows from it).
>> I don't hack on such docs enough to have a good feel for what would
>> be really useful, tho. The idea is just to try and turn those "code
>> in comment" back into non-comments.
> We (actually, mostly Ralf Angeli) currently are working on filling and
> insertion and other stuff in AUCTeX that will accept comments as a
> separate syntax domain with regard to LaTeX command insertion and
> indentation. Separate branch named new-fill, currently. Very
> impressive.
I don't actually understand what that means. Can you show an example?
> Well, _if_ it is not important then I would not be writing a comment
> in the first place! Far too lazy for that.
Well, I could say that making comments less legible forces one to read them
slowly so one better understands them ;-)
Stefan
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, (continued)
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Johan Bockgård, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Johan Bockgård, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/02/29
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/02/29
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/26
- Message not available
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, David Kastrup, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/27
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Dan Katz, 2004/02/26
- Re: Newbie: Interactive goto-line ?!, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/02/25