[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs for everything?

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: emacs for everything?
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:05:41 +0000
User-agent: tin/1.4.5-20010409 ("One More Nightmare") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.35 (i686))

Jay Belanger <address@hidden> wrote on Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:40:19 -0600:

> Pascal Bourguignon <address@hidden> writes:
>> Kai Grossjohann <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Currently, I use OpenBox.  It's painful, but I can bear it.

>> You should try clumpwm: it's written in Common-Lisp and modifiable on
>> the fly.

> Do you meant StumpWM?
> It's eventually going to be a common lisp successor to ratpoison; not
> as featureful yet, but still pretty cool.

What do you mean?  ratpoison doesn't _have_ features.  That's what makes
it so useable.  ;-)

> Jay

Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
Email: address@hidden; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
(like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]