[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terminology suggestion
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Terminology suggestion |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 06/22/2010 02:34 PM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> - RCS 5.7 and previous always said "RCS file", not "repository".
>
> - ttn's eyes glazed over reading "RCS file", RCS this, RCS that;
> started using "repo" in the source to describe a single ,v file;
> and in the end, succumbed to inflicting this intolerance on the users.
This is not a good time to be introducing new terminology.
Furthermore, the use of the word "repository" to mean "RCS file"
conflicts with longstanding practice in other revision control systems.
I'd stick with the term "RCS file" for now, to talk about single ,v files;
that's what people have been used to, and personal preference is
not a good enough reason to overturn longstanding standard practice.
- Terminology suggestion, Keith Thompson, 2010/06/21
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/06/22
- RE: Terminology suggestion, Cannon, Alastair, VF UK, Partner, 2010/06/22
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Keith Thompson, 2010/06/22
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/06/22
- Re: Terminology suggestion,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Keith Thompson, 2010/06/22
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Karl Berry, 2010/06/22
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/06/22
- Re: Terminology suggestion, Bob Proulx, 2010/06/22