[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
From: |
Memnon Anon |
Subject: |
Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved] |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:51:20 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Solved!
As I said, gnus per se did not add the message-id.
I confirmed this again by using
(setq message-generate-headers-first t).
No Message-Id was generated, but mail in ~/Mail/queued-mail/
had a Message-Id.
So I had a look at smtpmail.el. This file contains these lines:
;; Insert a `Message-Id:' field if there isn't one yet.
(goto-char (point-min))
(unless (re-search-forward "^Message-Id:" delimline t)
(insert "Message-Id: " (message-make-message-id) "\n"))
I just
- copied the file to smtpmail-changed.el
- added ;; in front of each of those three lines
- changed the last line to (provide 'smtpmail-changed)
- changed my .gnus to (require 'smtpmail-changed)
Now, my Message-Id is set by the google smtp-server ;)
Great!
Thanks to the author of smtpmail.el for extensively documenting
each single step in there!
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/04
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, renaudr, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved],
Memnon Anon <=
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/09
- Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/11
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/17