[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Option for sendmail.el
|
From: |
Memnon Anon |
|
Subject: |
Re: Option for sendmail.el |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:23:55 -0700 (PDT) |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On 14 Jul., 21:08, Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> OK, I found the problem. The priority order is not what I thought. Set
> message-user-fqdn to what you need. My fault, I misremembered the
> code.
Works! Thank you *very* much.
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, (continued)
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, renaudr, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/08
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/09
- Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/11
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el,
Memnon Anon <=