[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chroot and ".."
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Chroot and ".." |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:43:14 +0200 |
In the really early versions of UNIX, the "dvd" command was used to
execute "rm -r".
So now for a correction, no, `rm -r' did not use dsw (or as you call
it, dvd). dsw needed intractive input from the front-panel on the PDP
to do anything. The way rm -r was implemented was by calling `rm -r
*' for each subdirectory it traversed. This had been the case ever
since the 1st edition.
Infact, what you got as a result of running dsw was a coredump which
you later executed to actually remove the file. :-)
- Chroot and "..", (continued)
- Re: Chroot and "..", Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..",
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: Chroot and "..", Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: Chroot and "..", Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/13
- Re: Hurdish applications for persistence, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/13
- Re: Hurdish applications for persistence, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/13
- Re: Hurdish applications for persistence, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: Hurdish applications for persistence, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/14
- Re: Hurdish applications for persistence, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/14
- Re: Hurdish applications for persistence, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/14