[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy
|
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
|
Subject: |
Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:25:33 -0400 |
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 12:39 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> That's not a bad counter-example. Except that in the Hurd/L4 design,
> swapping is voluntary and explicit.
What happens when you run out of physical pages and you want to start a
new process? Given that the vast majority of processes are untrusted,
how to you guarantee that they give up storage?
shap
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, (continued)
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Matthieu Lemerre, 2005/10/21
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/21
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Matthieu Lemerre, 2005/10/21
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/22
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/23
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/23
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/31
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/21
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/22
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/23
- Re: EROS/Coyotos fault handers vs l4 pager hierarchy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/24
Re: EROS/Coyotos address spaces, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/20
Re: EROS/Coyotos address spaces, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/20