[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for the "love of HURD"
From: |
Daniel Martin |
Subject: |
Re: for the "love of HURD" |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:20:16 +0000 |
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 02:08 +0000, Daniel Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 02:45 +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> > Not quite, it seems:
> >
> > http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/how_wipo_works.html
>
> In any case many people consider WIPO to be badly named and campaign for
> it to be changed. If I recall the FSF disapproves of the name.
>
> As for those member states you have to wonder why they are member
> states. I would suspect it's because the recording industries `put
> pressure' on the political parties to encourage the `IP mentality'.
By the way earlier I was getting WIPO mixed up the BSA (the Business
Software Alliance). Sorry about that.
- Re: for the "love of HURD", (continued)
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD",
Daniel Martin <=
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Leonardo Pereira, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Leonardo Pereira, 2006/11/13
Re: for the "love of HURD", Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/11/10
Message not available