[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for the "love of HURD"
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: for the "love of HURD" |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:21:20 -0500 |
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 18:04 +0000, Daniel Martin wrote:
> No, the Hurd doesn't belong to RMS. Just as GNU doesn't belong to RMS.
FSF requires an assignment agreement for all contributions to FSF
projects. As I understand it, the Hurd is an FSF project. If so, the
Hurd belongs to FSF. This is a legal statement, not a philosophical
statement.
> Like all free software if it belongs to anyone it belongs to it's users.
> But then software is just mathematics, it's not property, so how can it
> belong to anyone?
Spoken like someone who has absolutely no idea how intellectual property
works in the law.
shap
- for the "love of HURD", arnuld, 2006/11/10
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Richard Braun, 2006/11/10
- Re: for the "love of HURD", arnuld, 2006/11/10
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13