Re: [libmicrohttpd] Anyone wants openssl support in libmicrohttpd?

[Christian Grothoff]

Ok, sounds to me like we certainly have a critical mass of volunteers to
review the patch, give feedback and help clean it up. So Olaf, now it's
just up to you to provide a convincing patch. Note that the goal should
be to make the result clean/neat, not the patch itself minimal. So if
you want/need to move existing gnutls stuff around a bit to make the
result nicer, that's totally fine.  Oh, and please do include additional
testcases, especially if you add OpenSSL-specific options.

Oh, and even if this patch happens and is acceptable, GnuTLS will remain
the default choice and what we will continue strongly recommend
distributions to use, if possible (i.e. if GnuTLS is available for the
platform).


Happy hacking!

Christian

On 11/04/2015 05:39 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Tomas Heran <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Hi.
>>
>> Definitely count me in!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tomas
>>
>> On 11/04/2015 10:50 AM, Olaf Buddenhagen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My employer considers implementing optional support for openssl as an
>>> alternative to gnutls in libmicrohttpd, as CoreOS apparently doesn't
>>> want to ship any SSL library besides openssl. So I need to solicit some
>>> feedback on whether anyone else would be interested in having openssl
>>> support?
>>>
>>> -antrik-
>>>
>>
> Me too! +1
>