[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2002 18:15:47 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I haven't read too carefully yet, just wanted to check
> that you didn't forget the current 1xxx style, i.e. that
> it only prints the numerator.
>
Yes, more or less:
> Number-style signatures:
> ------------------------
> If beat_unit is 1, do not print it, unless (transcription_shift != 0)
> and we are in transcribing mode.
Greetings,
Juergen
- Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Juergen Reuter, 2002/05/20
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/05/20
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature,
Juergen Reuter <=
- Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen, 2002/05/20
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Rune Zedeler, 2002/05/21
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Juergen Reuter, 2002/05/22
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen, 2002/05/22
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen, 2002/05/22
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Laura Conrad, 2002/05/23
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Juergen Reuter, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Laura Conrad, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/05/24