[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 11:44:33 +0200

address@hidden writes:
> On 23 May 2002, Laura Conrad wrote:
> > ...
> > If anyone wants to implement maxima, I think it looks like a longa
> > with the notehead about twice as wide.
> This has already been for quite a long time in lily. ;-)
> Just say something like: c\maxima
> > Speaking of which, if you are going to support mensural polyphony, one
> > thing that should change is the way barlines propagate between staves.
> > The fact that there's a barline in the top staff shouldn't necessarily
> > imply a barline in the others.
> > This would also make proofreading
> > easier.
> This should be possible by adding/removing various engravers from/to
> various contexts.  I will think about it.

Remove the timing-engraver from toplevel and insert in staff. Or set
Staff.whichBar manually to get a barline.


Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]