Re: Link to bug tracker

[Graham Percival]

Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:23:52PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:

> > > Frankly, I think it's better to have Graham as a filter to the 
> > > unwashed hordes (although Graham may disagree :-)
> > I agree that it's a good idea that not everybody can file a bug report 
> > directly
> > into the system,

I agree, but does the google disallow non-members from entering bugs?

> > but it would certainly be a good idea if anybody can browse
> > through the existing bug reports before they send their own possibly 
> > duplicate
> > bug report to the mailing list. Of course, the mailing list archives 
> > partly provides
> > the same service, but not completely.

Yes.  I'm going to alter the docs when I'm finished merging all the old 
bugs.

> On a related note, how goes the database? I have a bug that I
> submitted in April that doesn't seem to be in there, but I don't want
> to bug Graham by resubmitting it unless I'm sure it's been missed.

I have about a two dozen bugs left to do; I should finish them soon. 
That said, I don't have any remaining issues from you.  There were a few 
bug reports that I couldn't understand / couldn't reproduce / were 
covered by other bugs, and there probably a few bugs that were lost in 
the shuffle.

Cameron, if your bug still exists in 2.9.21, please resubmit.  I think I 
still have bug reports from everybody else, so don't resubmit stuff 
quite yet.

Cheers,
- Graham