[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reverted automatic-verison-number
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: reverted automatic-verison-number |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:50:30 -0800 |
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:53:50 +0100
John Mandereau <address@hidden> wrote:
> Le lundi 25 f__vrier 2008 __ 18:13 -0800, Graham Percival a __crit :
> > I have reverted the automatic-version-number patch in order to
> > continue working on the docs. Please do NOT re-apply this
> > patch until you are certain it works with GUB doc-building.
>
> The problem happens in Texinfo processing with TeX, so as far as I
> understand it has little to do with which LilyPond binary you use, but
> I'll check with EXTERNAL_BINARY to make sure.
I'm using texinfo 4.11, and I just checked and couldn't see a 4.12.
What version are you using?
> This tries to add exact version number (iso. 2.11.x) to Info docs,
> which isn't directly available otherwise. Additionnally, it avoids
> updating version numbers manually, i.e. with sed or by hand, as
> convert-ly doesn't update all version number occurences.
convert-ly most definitely *does* update the version numbers.
This does solve another problem, though: the templates (with LSR-import)
don't have any version numbers, so we might be able to use this to
add version numbers to them.
Cheers,
- Graham
- reverted automatic-verison-number, Graham Percival, 2008/02/25
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number, John Mandereau, 2008/02/26
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number, John Mandereau, 2008/02/27
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number, Graham Percival, 2008/02/28
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number, Graham Percival, 2008/02/28
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number, John Mandereau, 2008/02/28
- Re: reverted automatic-verison-number, Graham Percival, 2008/02/28