[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure with Scheme (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:21:56 -0700 |
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:02:03 +0200
Nicolas Sceaux <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Le 26 avr. 08 __ 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a __crit :
>
> > Le 26 avr. 08 __ 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a __crit :
> >
> >> It would be cool if we could define the markups like
> >>
> >> (define-markup-command (bla layout properties width arg) (number?
> >> markup?)
> >> ((line-thickness 0.0)
> >> (corner-radius 0.2))
> >>
> >> ..
> >> )
> >>
> >> where this defines that the bla command uses line-thickness and
> >> corner-radius, and automatically extracts them from properties.
> >> We could then annotate the bla command automatically.
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicolas, what do you think?
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't follow that thread. The aim is to automatically
> > extract
> > the properties a markup command is using, for the documentation,
> > right?
> > Then we could restrict this syntax change to builtin commands.
> > Anyway, implementing this should not be a problem. I can have a
> > look at it.
>
> Was not there also something about markup commands categories?
Valentin is already working on giving
define-builtin-markup-command an extra argument for "category",
and when we build the list of markup commands for the docs, we'd
group them by category. He had a preliminary patch which worked
(but was ugly) that I rejected a week or two ago.
I don't know precisely what Han-Wen and Mats were talking about,
though; it's beyond my understanding of the lilypond internals.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Build failure with Scheme (again), John Mandereau, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Mats Bengtsson, 2008/04/25
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/25
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again),
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Graham Percival, 2008/04/26
- RE: Build failure with Scheme (again), Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/04/26