[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line breaks and broken beams
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: line breaks and broken beams |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:54:21 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On 2009-09-27, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> What's the reason that line breaks are by default forbidden if
> >> there is a broken beam crossing the bar line, and that you have to
> >> set the `breakable' flag manually to override it?
> >>
> >> BTW, it is very unpleasant that lilypond doesn't emit any kind of
> >> warning if it produces an overlong staff caused by that issue. It
> >> silently accumulates unbreakable bars and happily walks out of the
> >> right margin. I would consider this behaviour a bug.
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > (I've always felt this way, too.)
>
> Then let's drop the IMHO unfounded limitation of not breaking at beams
> crossing a barline.
This would just require (I think) a revert of Han-Wen's commit
a6f65c52e2a20cd64067da45945e485d74ac3105.
See the attached patch. What do you think?
Thanks,
Patrick
0001-At-line-breaks-break-beams-by-default.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/26
- Re: line breaks and broken beams,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Carl Sorensen, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, David Kastrup, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/28