[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line breaks and broken beams
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: line breaks and broken beams |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:09:37 -0700 |
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:54 +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 28 oct. 09 à 08:37, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
> > Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> Isn't the problem that beams create melismata in vocal music, and you
> >> don't want to have a line break in the middle of a melisma?
> >
> > Baroque melisme can go on for lines. Do we have a way to discourage
> > breaks but not completely disallow them?
>
> Absolutely.
> Last week, while typesetting a chorus from Messiah with many beams
> crossing
> bar lines, I was about to report that as a bug. The lines were just
> running out
> of the page, which is a bug, period.
> In an ideal world, LilyPond would try not to break beams, but not
> forbid it.
> In a "worst is better" world (that is, our world), breaking beams is
> just not
> forbidden.
The line breaker has support for arbitrary penalties. If we had a
thorough set of examples, we could try to find a penalty that works
well. I'm reluctant, though, to just stick in an arbitrary penalty.
Joe
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/26
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Carl Sorensen, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, David Kastrup, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams,
Joe Neeman <=