[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 872 in lilypond: Changes split-page has broken images

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Issue 872 in lilypond: Changes split-page has broken images
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:31:31 -0200

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> wrote:

>> My bad, I'd only veto for lilypond/org/notation.html and all other
>> non-base-website docs alike.  I technically have nothing against putting
>> the base website at the root.
> Han-Wen?
> The technical reasons for using web/ and doc/v2.xx are:
>  - easier rsyncing, moving, verifying
>  - clean namespace -- currently we have quite some other
>    things at the root.  it's easy to get collisions, we
>    need to really think this through very well before
>    going forward with this

Can't we have the directory structure internally with /web/ ,
/download/ what have you, and use some serverside URL rewriting to
make translate




? Does apache have mechanisms for rewriting the serving path without
rewriting the URL that appears in browser window?  If not, I think it
makes sense to keep the /web/ prefix, so we keep have other
subsections of the web later.  Consider, for example, a hypotheticial

Also, do we want to keep old versions of the website (now that it has
been tied to the lilypond version?) online?

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden -

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]