[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:47:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> writes:
> Am Sonntag, 22. November 2009 01:17:10 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Neil Puttock <address@hidden> writes:
>> > 2009/11/21 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> >> Modifying Lilypond, then recompiling and reinstalling. That's not the
>> >> most hack-friendly way. I am still finding my way around.
>> >
>> > You're only modifying .scm files, so there shouldn't be any
>> > recompiling/reinstalling involved.
>>
>> They are lilypond .scm files, so I need to edit them either in the
>> source tree (where they won't get consulted without reinstalling) or in
>> the installed tree (where they will get overwritten on reinstalling) or
>> in private directories (where I get into search order mess when
>> different versions are flying around).
>
> The easiest way to develop lilypond is to execute the binary directly
> from the build tree (=source tree). In particular, I have a file
> ~/.bin/lilypond (~/.bin is in my $PATH) containing only:
> [...]
But the main point for me is that developing new functionality should
not involve tampering with existing files if possible. I don't want to
check every unfinished change into a branch of its own (which I have to
merge at some point of time) if it can be placed into a file of its own.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., (continued)
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22