[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:28:02 +0000 |
2009/11/21 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Yes, but that is no fun since I need _new_ internals local to the staff.
If you're happy just using \markup, then you can add the new property
to instrument-specific-markup-interface (see
define-grob-interfaces.scm).
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., (continued)
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Graham Percival, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Graham Percival, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/22
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22