[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consistency in \context block formatting
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Consistency in \context block formatting |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:33:07 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:01:16AM -0000, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, January 27, 2010 6:43 PM
>
>> I'm happy with having a newline there, but please glance over the
>> LM stuff you wrote, and confirm that you prefer it with a newline.
>> I'll get James to make the appropriate changes, both to the CG and
>> LM, but I'd like your explicit approval first.
>
> Well, having just read through the whole of tweaks
> I could find only one section, 4.6.2 Style sheets,
> which contained the format you adopted. I did notice
> a few other inconsistencies, but pretty well the
> whole of tweaks already follows Neil's suggestions.
I did this:
learning/$ git grep "\\\\context"
fundamental.itely:@subsubheading Setting context properties with @code{\context}
fundamental.itely:@cindex context properties, setting with \context
fundamental.itely:@funindex \context
fundamental.itely:@code{\context} block within a @code{\layout} block. Each
fundamental.itely:@code{\context} block will affect all contexts of the type spe
fundamental.itely: \context { \Staff
fundamental.itely: \context { \Staff
fundamental.itely:@code{\set} command in a @code{\context} block in the
tweaks.itely: \context @{ \Score
tweaks.itely: \context @{ \Staff
tweaks.itely: \context @{ \Voice
tweaks.itely: \context { \Score
tweaks.itely: \context { \Staff
tweaks.itely: \context { \Voice
tweaks.itely: \context @{ \Score
tweaks.itely: \context @{ \Staff
tweaks.itely: \context @{ \Voice
tweaks.itely: \context { \Score
tweaks.itely: \context { \Voice
since the only different ones were the two " \context { \Staff" lines
in fundamental.itely, I went that way.
> Please ask James to put the newline back, and amend
> the style sheets to match. I think this is much
> better.
Ok.
Cheers,
- Graham