[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changes to Clef
From: |
Patrick Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: changes to Clef |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:18:51 +0100 |
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:32 +1100
> Von: Peter Chubb <address@hidden>
> An: Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> CC: Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>, Patrick Schmidt <address@hidden>,
> "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Betreff: Re: changes to Clef
> >>>>> "Graham" == Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Graham> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 07:51:03PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> Graham> I'd rather keep them at the end, to somewhat discourage their
> Graham> use. Only music history geeks will understand them; \treble
> Graham> is much more widely understood.
>
>
> Not entirely true. Music theoreticians will also understand them --
> the `treble' clef is a G clef on the second staff line; the `bass'
> clef is an F clef on the fourth staff line -- that's how it was always
> explained to me when I was learning music. And check the Wikipedia
> article on Clef.
+1
They are commonly used by music educators and in instruction books. I'd even
say G, C and F clefs are less abstract than treble, alto or bass clefs as they
directly help to "decode" the score which is IMHO the main function of a clef.
> --
> Dr Peter Chubb www.nicta.com.au peter DOT chubb AT
> nicta.com.au
> http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT
> Australia
> From Imagination to Impact Imagining the (ICT)
> Future
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01